NCAA President Calls for Action on College Sports “Prediction Markets”
The NCAA is escalating its fight against what it sees as a new form of gambling targeting college athletes. In a letter sent Wednesday, NCAA President Charlie Baker urged federal regulators to suspend so-called “prediction markets” that allow users to trade on the outcomes of college sports games.
Baker addressed the letter to the chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency that oversees these types of trading platforms. The core of the NCAA’s argument is that these markets, while framed as financial trading, function almost identically to sports betting—a direct threat to the integrity of college sports and the well-being of student-athletes.
What Are Prediction Markets?
Prediction markets are online platforms where users can buy and sell “shares” based on the predicted outcome of future events, such as whether a specific team will win a game or if a player will score a certain number of points. The value of these shares fluctuates based on market sentiment, and users profit by accurately predicting the outcome.
To the NCAA, this is gambling by another name. The association argues that these markets create the same pressures and integrity risks as traditional sportsbooks, potentially exposing young athletes to harassment and incentivizing insider information leaks or game manipulation.
Protecting Athletes and Game Integrity
This move by the NCAA is part of a broader, ongoing effort to shield college sports from the rapidly expanding landscape of legalized gambling. The association has strict rules prohibiting athletes, coaches, and staff from engaging in any sports wagering.
“The NCAA is drawing a line in the sand,” said one sports law analyst. “They’re telling regulators that just because an activity is packaged as a ‘futures market’ doesn’t mean it escapes the fundamental concerns associated with betting on amateur sports. The potential for harm to students and the games themselves remains.”
The letter from President Baker signals a proactive shift towards federal intervention. Rather than battling state-by-state gambling expansions, the NCAA is seeking a top-down regulatory solution from Washington. It remains to be seen how the CFTC will respond, but the request sets the stage for a significant policy debate over the blurry line between financial speculation and sports gambling in the digital age.
« From Screen to Catwalk: Hudson Williams Makes Milan Fashion Week Debut for Dsquared2
Georgia’s “Fiscal Fury”: New Poll Reveals Property Tax as the Most Hated Levy »